D.C. Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 6,032
ROLLINS v. MONTGOMERY
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA BOLLINS and LAKEISHA ROLLINS
Defendant:
STEPHEN MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ISOM v. NELSON
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
JANE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SOOS v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
EMERY SOOS
Defendant:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and WALT C. DANNENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HURT v. VOL. CONSTITUTION 1608-1775 et al
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
VOL. CONSTITUTION 1608-1775, NATIONAL MUSUEM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY AND CULTURE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HURT v. VOL. CONSTITUTION 1608- 1775 et al
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
VOL. CONSTITUTION 1608- 1775, AMERICAN HERITAGE COLLEGE DICTIONARY and FORMER LORTON COMPLEX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
FREDERICK v. PEPCO
as 1:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
TYANNA FREDERICK
Defendant:
PEPCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5041
Plaintiff:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Head of the United States Department of Justice. Named in is official capacity, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cedric Greene v. St. Vincent De Paul
as 24-7024
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
St. Vincent De Paul, Cardinal Manning Center
AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR EQUAL RIGHTS v. ZAMANILLO et al
as 1:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN ALLIANCE FOR EQUAL RIGHTS
Defendant:
JORGE ZAMANILLO and CROSBY KEMPER
Amicus Curiae:
AFRO LATINO FORUM, ASPIRA ASSOCIATION and HISPANIC FEDERATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
