D.C. Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 6,030
TADESSE v. OREGON STATE CT & COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
YODIT DAGNE TADESSE
Defendant:
OREGON STATE CT & COUNTY, JOHN L. BARLOW, STUBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
Danny Hirschfield v. United States Attorney's Office for the District, et al
as 24-5008
Plaintiff:
Danny Joe Hirschfield, Lord
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia and Superior Court for the District of Columbia, Criminal Division
LYLE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
EDWARD W. LYLE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simon Ateba v. Karine Jean-Pierre, et al
as 24-5004
Plaintiff:
Simon Ateba
Defendant:
Karine Jean-Pierre, in her official capacity as Press Secretary to the President of the United States, United States Secret Service and Kimberly Cheatle, in her official capacity as Director of the United States Secret Service
N. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
L. N., Jessica North Macie and Jani North Saale
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
ALLEN v. NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION
as 1:2024cv00096
Defendant:
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION and N.R.A.
Plaintiff:
WALTER ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEN v. DEPT. OF CITY WIDE ADMIN. SVCS.
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
WALTER ALLEN
Defendant:
DEPT. OF CITY WIDE ADMIN. SVCS.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nickholas Knight, Sr. v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 24-5001
Plaintiff:
Nickholas Knight, Sr.
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., United States Department of Homeland Security, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
