District of District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,855
Hackler v. CVS PHARMACY, L.L.C.
as 1:2017cv01435
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Eddie Hackler
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv01434
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE GRANT, II
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
COOK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv01407
Plaintiff:
DONNA COOK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
CHELMOWSKI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv01394
Plaintiff:
JAMES CHELMOWSKI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
HUNT v. SESSIONS
as 1:2017cv01362
Plaintiff:
PHAYLYN M. HUNT
Defendant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
COCKRUM et al v. DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01370
Plaintiff:
ROY COCKRUM , SCOTT COMER , ERIC SCHOENBERG
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., ROGER STONE
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
DEPASS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv01359
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , JOHN NELSON, JOHN DOES 1 AND 2
Plaintiff:
TREVOR DEPASS
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2017cv01350
Plaintiff:
LATASHA SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
PILOT v. KOLLAR-KOTELLY et al
as 1:2017cv01337
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHARLES PILOT
Defendant:
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, CHANNING D. PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
MONROE-RICKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv01259
Plaintiff:
VICKY MONROE-RICKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER
and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
