US District Court for the District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 10,328
MARSH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Anthony Marsh II and ANTHONY MARSH, II
Not Yet Classified:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
Anthony Delborrell, JOHN BEWLEY and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PAGE v. EVANS
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. PAGE
Defendant:
MONICA H. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SMITH THEE v. U.S. SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. SMITH THEE
Defendant:
SECRET SERVICE and U.S. SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
VANDERPLOEG v. BLINKEN
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
BELGIN J. VANDERPLOEG
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
EDWARDS v. CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Defendant:
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION, EMMET G. SULLIVAN, PHH MORTGAGE ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
ROLLINS v. OTTMAN
as 1:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA ROLLINS
Defendant:
JULIE OTTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROLLINS v. MONTGOMERY
as 1:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA BOLLINS and LAKEISHA ROLLINS
Defendant:
STEPHEN MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ISOM v. NELSON
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
JANE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
