Federal Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Frazier v. Marlin, TX
as 23-1865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHEYENNE MITCHELL FRAZIER
Defendant:
MARLIN, TX
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN SODEK, by and through his heirs at law, Vicki Sodek and Randy Sodek
Praileau v. US
as 23-1642
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM PRAILEAU, dba Without Prejudice, Kingdom of Priests
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, NEW YORK STATE JUSTIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
Lomax v. Miami Police Department
as 23-1504
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHNNIE BERNELL MATHIS
Roberts v. Studio 15 Management
as 23-1453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA LOUISE ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
STUDIO 15 MANAGEMENT, RUTH RIVERIA and JOVANNA Q.
Finn v. State of New York
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE H. FINN and GEORGE HENRY FINN, II
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEW YORK, HINMAN HOWARD & KATTELL, LLC, KATHERINE A. FITZGERALD and others
Sanford v. Franklin, VA
as 23-1028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH L. SANFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN, VA, SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR and SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Jolly v. Excelsior College
as 22-2229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAKETA S. JOLLY
Defendant / Appellee:
EXCELSIOR COLLEGE, MARY LEE POLLARD, JOANNE LEONE and others
Bravenec v. Martin
as 22-2191
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EDWARD BRAVENEC, et al.
Defendant / Appellant:
ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR.
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 22-2121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., SAP AMERICA, INC. and others
Jones-Bey v. Chen
as 22-2019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SISTER E. JONES-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
PAMELA K. CHEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, LETITIA JAMES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
