Second Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 25,565
Gray v. Rogers et al
as 3:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Bennie Gray, Jr
Defendant:
Cornelius Rogers, Knotts, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Gonzalez, Nordby, The Town of Newtown Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mines v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Alfred Mines
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Boyd
Defendant:
Semple, Arone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payton v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Albert Payton
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
French v. Montgomery et al
as 9:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Darren French and Daren French
Defendant:
J. Montgomery, Sgt. Extrand, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rifenburg v. Heimer et al
as 9:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Alex Rifenburg
Defendant:
Antonia Heimer and Madison County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vreeland v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 9:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Elijah Q. Vreeland
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center, Dep Rapp, Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Fulton County Police Department
as 1:2024cv02898
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Fulton County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv02906
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
