Second Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 63,132
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03004
Plaintiff:
John Yung
Defendant:
Sgt. Adams, Nyc Dept of Corrections and The People of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Masa v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02902
Plaintiff:
Kevin Masa
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02900
Plaintiff:
Elmer Moreno
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Breton v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Randy Breton, Sr
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagan v. U.S. Marshal
as 1:2024cv02897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hagan
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zaragosa-Solis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02901
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chen v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Wu Long Chen
Defendant:
M. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marozzi v. Interlicchia et al
as 6:2024cv06223
Plaintiff:
Quentin A. Marozzi
Defendant:
Nicholas Interlicchia, Matthew Daminski, L. Strapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Kevin et al
as 1:2024cv02949
Plaintiff:
Kejohna King
Defendant:
Jodice Kevin, Edgar Kevin, Salazaa Gilberto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02969
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Flores
Defendant:
The State of New York, Department of Corrections Community Supervision, Officer S. Mentigny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
