Second Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 7,551 - 7,560 of 63,238
Aigbekaen v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Respondent:
United States of America, D. Easter and USA
Petitioner:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lapierre et al v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2021cv00464
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda, Capt. Donahue, C.O. Barrera and others
Plaintiff:
Jahlil Treasure, Antinio Cullal, Westley Witts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierre v. State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe, Wyoming County Community Hospital (Warsaw) and others
Plaintiff:
Marcel Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latimer v. The State of New York Green Haven Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00394
Defendant:
Sgt. Muzelly, Sgt. Rossi, The State of New York Green Haven Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Corey A. Latimer, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Johnson
as 1:2021cv00316
Respondent:
J. Johnson
Petitioner:
Lamont Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kilgore v. Conway et al
as 9:2021cv00095
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, Justice Center Jail, Conway and others
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Miller et al
as 9:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Defendant:
Miller and Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pilenza v. Unknown Agents, et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Pilenza
Defendant:
CT Police, Driscol and Unknown Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Robinson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rubbo v. Easter
as 3:2021cv00109
Respondent:
D. Easter
Petitioner:
Pasquale Rubbo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
