Third Circuit Contract Cases

Negotiable Instrument Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 582
DEBTCO OF NEW JERSEY, LLC v. ASSET SCIENCE, LLC
as 2:2017cv11539
Plaintiff: DEBTCO OF NEW JERSEY, LLC
Defendant: ASSET SCIENCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CRANE
as 1:2017cv00298
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RAYMOND C. CRANE
Cause Of Action: USA Plaintiff
Kenney v. Sparks
as 1:2017cv01985
Plaintiff: Shariya Danielle Kenney
Defendant: Geneva G. Sparks
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
RUBIN v. WINTRUST MORTGAGE
as 2:2017cv08201
Defendant: WINTRUST MORTGAGE
Plaintiff: AARON RUBIN
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal- Negotiable Instrumen
HUA et al v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZONA et al
as 3:2017cv07662
Plaintiff: TRACY HUA , CHI-HUNG MU
Defendant: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ARIZONA, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NEVADA, RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Contract Real Estate
NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP et al v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv04278
Plaintiff: NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP , NEW HANOVER TOWNSHIP AUTHORITY
Defendant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Default of Loan by Promissary Note
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. Epps
as 1:2017cv06756
Defendant: Darlene Epps
Plaintiff: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: Bank Foreclosure
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FARM SERVICE AGENCY v. DONATO
as 1:2017cv06397
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FARM SERVICE AGENCY
Defendant: ANTHONY DONATO
Cause Of Action: Default of Promissory Note
THE BANK OF PRINCETON v. MARRAZZO
as 2:2017cv03709
Plaintiff: THE BANK OF PRINCETON
Defendant: JOSEPH A. MARRAZZO
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
XIMUHAMMAD v. CLYDE
as 2:2017cv05991
Plaintiff: NEDRAH C XIMUHAMMAD
Defendant: MICHAEL CLYDE
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Account Receivable

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?