Third Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 181 - 190 of 452
CAVOLO et al v. CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC
as 3:2014cv07084
Plaintiff:
JAMES CAVOLO and NANCY CAVOLO
Defendant:
CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maria Garlick v. Trans Tech Logistics Inc, et al
as 14-4186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA GARLICK, As Administor of the Estate of George B. Garlick, III and in Her Own Right
Defendant - Appellee:
TRANS TECH LOGISTICS INC, QC ENERGY RESOURCES INC, QC ENERGY RESOURCES LLC and others
TEDESCO et al v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv06317
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TEDESCO, JR. and NATALIA TUZOVSKAYA
Defendant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. and FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROCHEY et al v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC
as 1:2014cv00253
Plaintiff:
CHERYL A. BROCHEY and DANNY E. BROCHEY
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bloom v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2014cv01903
Plaintiff:
Karen Bloom
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Q+FOOD LLC v. MITSUBISHI FUSO TRUCK OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2014cv06046
Plaintiff:
Q+FOOD LLC
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI FUSO TRUCK OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Q+FOOD LLC v. MITSUBISHI FUSO TRUCK OF AMERICA, INC.
as 3:2014cv06046
Plaintiff:
Q+FOOD LLC
Defendant:
MITSUBISHI FUSO TRUCK OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Holder et al v. Suarez et al
as 3:2014cv01789
Plaintiff:
Michael Holder, Jr. and Heather Williams
Defendant:
Wilfredo Suarez , Evans Delivery Company, Inc. and Interpool Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLHOUSE et al v. YODERS
as 2:2014cv01161
Plaintiff:
SHADY MILLHOUSE and KELLY MILLHOUSE
Defendant:
JEROME B. YODERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEVENSON v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.
as 3:2014cv05250
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEVENSON
Defendant:
MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
