Third Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 93,717
IVEY v. ALLERGAN, INC. et al
as 2:2024md00014
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC. and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
PAULA IVEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCGRATH v. ALLERGAN, INC. et al
as 2:2024md00015
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC. and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE MCGRATH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAULSEN v. ALLERGAN, INC. et al
as 2:2024md00016
Defendant:
ALLERGAN USA, INC. and ALLERGAN, INC.
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN PAULSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WITTKE v. ALLERGAN, INC. et al
as 2:2024md00017
Plaintiff:
LISA WITTKE
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC. and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOGGS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03252
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
ANDREA BOGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEETLE v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03253
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN BEETLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GENIESSE v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv03255
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GENIESSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BAILEY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03257
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
ERIKA BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03259
Plaintiff:
JUDY JOHNSON
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03266
Plaintiff:
MARLIN JONES
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
