Third Circuit Torts - Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,580
KUHN v. WILLFORD
as 2:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
PETER KUHN
Defendant:
JOVAN WILLFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sam Antar v. BetMGM LLC, et al
as 24-1364
Plaintiff:
SAM A. ANTAR
Defendant:
BETMGM LLC, BORGATA HOTEL CASINO AND SPA and MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL INC
LIVINGSTON v. WILLIAMS
as 2:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
MERLYN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRIS v. VIVINT, INC.
as 1:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
HARRIS DOUGHTY and DOUGHTY HARRIS
Defendant:
VIVINT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
DURHAM v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
JESSICA DURHAM
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Costa et al v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Stacy Costa, Nathaniel Guerrero, Missy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
JOHNSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
GENEVA DANIELS, STEPHANIE DANIELS, DEIDRA DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
STEPHANIE DANIELS, DEIDRA DANIELS, JESSICA DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLICK GO AND BUY INC. v. IT ASSETS, INC.
as 2:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
CLICK GO AND BUY INC.
Defendant:
IT ASSETS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
NEMO DIGITAL HOLDINGS CORP. v. XYZ FINANCIAL MARKETS LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
NEMO DIGITAL HOLDINGS CORP.
Defendant:
XYZ FINANCIAL MARKETS LLC, QTRADE CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, BARRY FRIEDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
