US District Court for the District of New Jersey Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 19,603
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
NAFTALOVICH v. U.S. SUPREME COURT
as 2:2024cv04610
Plaintiff:
DANIEL NAFTALOVICH
Defendant:
U.S. SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
JOHN DOE-1 et al v. LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04566
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE-1 and JANE DOE-2
Defendant:
LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MANAGEMENT, LLC, RICHARD ROES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
POSYTON, v. TOWN OF WESTFIELD
as 2:2024cv04611
Plaintiff:
RONALD H. POSYTON, III
Defendant:
TOWN OF WESTFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIMMONS
as 2:2024cv04537
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R.G. SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOODWIN v. CITY OF PATERSON, et al.
as 2:2024cv04544
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. PRECISELY HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04571
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, JANE DOE-1, JANE DOE-2 and others
Defendant:
PRECISELY HOLDINGS, LLC, PRECISELY SOFTWARE INC., PRECISELY SOFTWARE LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
