US District Court for the District of New Jersey
Cases 231 - 240 of 228,005
74-00078 MAPLE AVENUE, LLC v. TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED et al
as 3:2024cv06639
Plaintiff:
74-78 MAPLE AVENUE, LLC
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED and TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED LAND USE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY et al
as 3:2024cv06657
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and VONDALYN MCKEITHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
RAMOS v. RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06645
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN RAMOS
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOPKINS v. HICKS et al
as 1:2024cv06646
Plaintiff:
AL-QUON HOPKINS
Defendant:
ADM. MARCUS HICKS and NURSE MARSHA LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06638
Plaintiff:
ANNAMARIE SANTOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
