Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 15,107
CIVIDINI v. SESSIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00845
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00846
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
COLON v. COUNTY OF BUCKS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00822
Plaintiff: FERNANDINO COLON
Defendant: COUNTY OF BUCKS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HOFFMAN HALL BUILDING B
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
DEBERRY v. COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2017cv00795
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL DEBERRY
Defendant: COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL S. KEEN, SCOTT M. GOLDY and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PARISH et al
as 2:2017cv00791
Plaintiff: PAUL WILLIAMS
Defendant: PARISH, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00762
Petitioner: ALONZO JONES
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WORTHEM v. GIBBS
as 2:2017cv00760
Plaintiff: PRESTON WORTHEM
Defendant: GIBBS
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
ROGERS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv00761
Petitioner: JEROME L. ROGERS
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, SETH WILLIAMS, GIOVANNI CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
v. PETRUSKY et al
as 2:2017cv00763
Defendant: DANIEL PETRUSKY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
J.M.V.R. et al v. KELLY et al
as 5:2017cv00703
Petitioner: J.M.V.R. , ELSA MILAGROS RODRIGUES GARCIA
Respondent: JOHN F. KELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?