Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 14,769
SIMMONS v. U.S. ATTORNEY et al
as 2:2016cv05033
Plaintiff: JAMAHL SIMMONS
Defendant: U.S. ATTORNEY, USPIS OF PHILADELPHIA DIRECTOR/HEAD
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
REAVES v. MARLER
as 2:2016cv05034
Petitioner: IMIR REAVES
Respondent: SEAN MARLER
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
THOMAS v. MCGINLEY et al
as 5:2016cv05008
Petitioner: CHRISTIAN S. THOMAS
Respondent: THOMAS MCGINLEY, BRUCE BEEMER
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENRY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv05010
Petitioner: MICHAEL JOSEPH HENRY
Respondent: BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BASS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2016cv05026
Petitioner: TYREE BASS
Respondent: MICHAEL CLARK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PRATT v. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv05011
HENDERSON v. MAY et al
as 2:2016cv05004
Petitioner: JMAR M. HENDERSON
Respondent: G. MAY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOTEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv05005
Plaintiff: RAMEL MOTEN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HARPER v. SALAMEH et al
as 2:2016cv05009
Plaintiff: TONY R. HARPER
Defendant: JAWAD SALAMEH, CONEMAUGH MEDICAL CENTER, ANNETT KOWALEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BEAUFORD v. THE WARDEN OF CFCF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04994
Plaintiff: TYRONE BEAUFORD
Defendant: THE WARDEN OF CFCF PHILADELPHIA, COUNTY PRISON AND ALL CHAINE OF COMMEND OFFICIALS, CFCF MEDICAL SUPERVISOR ASISTANE and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?