Eastern District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 14,704
HENRY v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2016cv04612
Petitioner: CLARENCE HENRY
Respondent: MARK GARMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHIL., THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DEWALD v. JENKINS et al
as 2:2016cv04597
DEJESUS TORRES v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv04576
JURAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv04575
Plaintiff: FEDA JURAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RANDALL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2016cv04566
Petitioner: RAMSEY WESLEY RANDALL
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. PRIME MEDICAL CARE PROVIDER et al
as 5:2016cv04559
Plaintiff: HOWARD LEE WILLIAMS, III
Defendant: PRIME MEDICAL CARE PROVIDER, JESSE KIRSH, KEN R. WLOCZEWSKI
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
PEARSON-KELLY v. CFCF
as 2:2016cv04535
Plaintiff: MARCUS C PEARSON-KELLY
Defendant: CFCF
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PRIME MEDICAL CARE PROVIDER et al
as 5:2016cv04560
Plaintiff: HOWARD LEE WILLIAMS, III
Defendant: PRIME MEDICAL CARE PROVIDER, BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PA: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2016cv04563
Plaintiff: HOWARD LEE WILLIAMS, III
Defendant: PA: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA STATE PAROLLE, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE MAHANOY
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
FUTURE v. FERGESON et al
as 2:2016cv04565
Petitioner: JEFFREY G. FUTURE
Respondent: TAMMY FERGESON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LACKAWANNA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?