U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Other Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,388
Mithun Banerjee v. Rand Gelber
as 24-1198
Plaintiff: MITHUN BANERJEE
Defendant: JUDGE RAND LEWIS GELBER, ADMIN JUDGE SHERRI DEBRA KOCH, JUDGE JOHN CHRISTIAN MOFFETT and others
Matilda Turner v. Micah Ennis
as 24-1189
Plaintiff: MATILDA TURNER
Defendant: MICAH ENNIS, Rowan County School Director, ROWAN COUNTY COURTHOUSE, DAYMARK RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. and others
Paul Shao v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 24-1190
Plaintiff: PAUL SHAO
Defendant: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Marty Hierholzer v. Isabel Guzman
as 24-1187
Plaintiff: MARTY HIERHOLZER and MJL ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Virginia corporation
Defendant: ISABEL GUZMAN, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Small Business Administration and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Wesley Smith, III v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-1181
Plaintiff: WESLEY EDWARD SMITH, III
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, TIM KAINE, ROBERT A. DYBING and others
Mithun Banerjee v. Timothy Branigan
as 24-1184
Plaintiff: MITHUN BANERJEE
Defendant: MR. TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, JUDGE PETER J. MESSITTE, PJM, JUDGE MARIA ELLENA CHAVEZ-RUARK, MCR and others
Kevin Reece v. Thomas Horner
as 24-1183
Plaintiff: KEVIN RAY REECE
Defendant: THOMAS HORNER, MATTHEW DAVID LEACH, LEE B. BOLLINGER and others
Steven Albert v. Brooke Lierman
as 24-1170
Plaintiff: STEVEN G. ALBERT and BARRY DIAMOND
Defendant: BROOKE E. LIERMAN, in her official capacity as the Comptroller of the State of Maryland
Montgomery County, MD v. Mithun Banerjee
as 24-1169
Plaintiff: MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
Defendant: MITHUN BANERJEE
Todd Short v. Michael Boyd
as 24-1150
Plaintiff: TODD W. SHORT
Defendant: MICHAEL BOYD, FBI Special Agent, in his individual capacity and JOHN DOES, FBI Special Agents 1-6, in their individual capacities

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?