US District Court for the District of Maryland
Cases 171 - 180 of 76,804
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garrett v. Wicomico County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Marcel D. Garrett
Defendant:
Wicomico County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Vaughey et al
as 1:2024cv01063
Plaintiff:
Phillip Hill
Defendant:
John Vaughey, Jack Truppo Burbage, John Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurston v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv01095
Petitioner:
Richard Thurston
Respondent:
Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01143
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
El-Bey v. Ndze et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Ndze, Farinloye and Boyd Cod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Assefa v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01136
Plaintiff:
Yonas Assefa
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
