US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 14,384
Williams et al v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03095
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Williams, Christopher Mosby, Gabrial E. Cummings and others
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Marc McPherson, Jason Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02085
Petitioner:
Omarion Drake
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03094
Plaintiff:
Bradly Mitchell Smith
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bragg v. USA
as 5:2024cv00224
Petitioner:
Tyrone Bragg
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ezeah v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02083
Petitioner:
Ken Ejimofor Ezeah
Respondent:
Warden K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tvrdy v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02084
Petitioner:
Jarod Steven Tvrdy
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corns v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2024ct03093
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Corns
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Sgt. Santifull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davila v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03092
Plaintiff:
Noel Davila
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02081
Petitioner:
Ritchie Williams
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lutz v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02082
Petitioner:
Joshua D. Lutz
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
