North Carolina Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Bolino v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02079
Petitioner:
Michael Bolino
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Redman v. American Airlines, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barbara Redman
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc. and Marcos Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kritter et al v. Daw et al
as 5:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Lynne E Kritter and Kritter Cropdusting, Inc.
Defendant:
Margie F Daw, Daw Farms, Inc., Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
YORK v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
WANDA JOAN YORK
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. United Airlines, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
Taryn Dixon
Defendant:
United Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GULF STATES AIRCRAFT SALES, LLC et al v. AIRPLANE HOLDING, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00527
Plaintiff:
Gulf States Aircraft Sales, LLC, SouthTec Aviation, LLC and Errol Bader
Defendant:
Airplane Holding, LLC and Michael Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schell v. JetBlue Airways Corporation *Do not docket in this case. See case 5:21-cv-90-BO.
as 4:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Brandy Schell
Defendant:
JetBlue Airways Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schell v. JetBlue Airways Corporation
as 5:2021cv00090
Plaintiff:
Brandy Schell
Defendant:
JetBlue Airways Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OWEN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00621
Plaintiff:
SALLY ANN OWEN
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. , US AIRWAYS, INC. , US AIRWAYS EXPRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yarbor v. US Airways, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00253
Defendant:
US Airways, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carl Yarbor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
