North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 7,986
KERR v. USA
as 1:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
NORMAN ALAN KERR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mendez Palacios v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02061
Petitioner:
Gregori Jerson Mendez Palacios
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abrams v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Larry Abrams
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amadi v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02060
Petitioner:
Okechukwu Desmond Amadi
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VELEZ v. USA
as 1:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALAN VELEZ, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilder v. Evers et al
as 5:2024hc02059
Petitioner:
Lawrence Verline Wilder
Respondent:
Administrator Evers, Ed McMahon, Benjamin David and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Littlejohn v. Hawkins
as 1:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Jermaine Valgaue Littlejohn
Respondent:
Shanticia Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ransom v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02058
Petitioner:
Clarence Michael Ransom
Respondent:
Warden D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McMahon v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02057
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph McMahon
Respondent:
Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Peterson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02056
Petitioner:
Lowell Peterson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
