South Carolina Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,815
Uygur et al v. South Carolina et al
as 3:2023cv06879
Plaintiff:
Cenk Uygur and John Ward
Defendant:
South Carolina, Henry McMaster, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas-West v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 4:2023cv06827
Plaintiff:
Helene Thomas-West and Helena Thomas-West
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sumter v. Simmer et al
as 3:2023cv06759
Plaintiff:
Jareca Talena Sumter and Jareca Sumter
Defendant:
Curtis Loftis, Dr. Edwards Simmer, Gina M Raimonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guess v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv06408
Plaintiff:
Thurmond Guess, Sr.
Defendant:
Leonardo Brown, Darrell Jackson, Sr., Rose Ann English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Von Fox v. Gergel et al
as 2:2023cv06273
Plaintiff:
Von Fox Glynndeavin and Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant:
Judge Richard Gergel and Judge Mary Gordon Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Downing v. Eckstrom et al
as 3:2023cv06189
Plaintiff:
Tanawah M. Downing
Defendant:
Alexander Carl Eckstrom, Diana Nicole Ruff and Alexander Carl Ekstrom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booker v. Toal et al
as 3:2023cv06187
Plaintiff:
Patrick Booker
Defendant:
Jean Toal, Costa Pleicones, Donald Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Henry v. Thompson
as 4:2023cv06113
Plaintiff:
Patrick Henry, III
Defendant:
Phillip E Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scipio v. Finklea, Hendrick & Blake, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv06088
Plaintiff:
Eshawn Jessica Scipio
Defendant:
Finklea, Hendrick & Blake, LLC, Gary I. Finklea, Charlie Blake, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
