US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 131 - 140 of 21,066
Charles v. Loudoun Times-Mirror et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff: Lawrence Charles
Defendant: Loudoun Times-Mirror, Ogden Newspapers and Evan Goodenow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yo v. Smith
as 3:2024cv00161
Petitioner: Yo
Respondent: Nelson Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Singleton v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff: Elijah Singleton
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00163
Petitioner: Keith Owens
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00355
Petitioner: Sol D. Burke
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holloway v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff: Tyrone L. Holloway
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coley v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00165
Petitioner: Terrance Coley
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salahuddin v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00146
Petitioner: Khalil A. Salahuddin
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Navarro v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00139
Petitioner: Ismael Hernandez-Navarro
Respondent: Virginia Commonwealth of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?