US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 4,373
C.P. v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
C. P.
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
D. B. v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00064
Plaintiff:
D. B.
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
R. J. v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00065
Defendant:
The United States of America
Plaintiff:
R. J.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jarrett v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 2:2021cv00051
Plaintiff:
Melisa Jarrett
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and doing business as Kroger and Unknown Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe et al v. Cabell County Board of Education et al
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Cabell County Board of Education and Jason Curry
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lockhart et al v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
as 2:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jonavieve Lockhart and Barry D. Lockhart
Defendant:
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
as 2:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Miller
Defendant:
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deal et al v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
as 2:2021cv00020
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Deal and Janet L. Deal
Defendant:
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterman v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, et al
as 2:2021cv00016
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Todd Rollins, Norfolk Southern Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Peterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Putney v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv00874
Plaintiff:
Lester Putney
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
