US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Torts - Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Thaxton, et al. v. Washington Mutual Bank, N.A.
as 2:2007cv00302
Plaintiff:
John W. Thaxton and Kathy L. Thaxton
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank, NA and Washington Mutual Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
State of West Virginia v. BlueHippo Funding, LLC
as 2:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
State of West Virginia and Darrell V. McGraw, Jr.
Defendant:
BlueHippo Funding, LLC, BlueHippo Funding, LLC, BlueHippo Funding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Duffey et al v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00165
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. and Syncom
Plaintiff:
Robin G. Duffey and William S. Duffey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bradley v. New Century Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv00087
Plaintiff:
Annette R. Bradley and Annette R. Bradley
Defendant:
New Century Mortgage Corporation, First Republic Mortgage Corporation, Inc., Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Barnes v. Moffatt et al
as 2:2006cv00662
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to Bankruptcy Case
Perry et al v. ABN-AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2006cv00642
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Turnes v. Valued Services of West Virginia, LLC et al
as 2:2006cv00445
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Holmes v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2006cv00330
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Allen et al v. Equity South Mortgage, LLC et al
as 6:2006cv00293
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Browning et al v. Global Mortgage Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2005cv01139
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
