U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,823
Higgins v. Lumpkin
as 23-10316
Petitioner / Appellant:
Lawrence Higgins
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Green v. Lumpkin
as 23-40186
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tray Dewayne Green
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Ricks v. Hooper
as 23-30177
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wesley Ricks
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Acker v. Lumpkin
as 23-20119
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jason Eugene Acker
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Coleman v. Vannoy
as 23-30176
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert Glen Coleman
Respondent / Appellee:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Parks v. District of Arizona
as 23-10299
Petitioner / Appellant:
Edward Faye Parks
Respondent / Appellee:
District of Arizona and 4th Cir Appeals
Lara v. Lumpkin
as 23-20113
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jose Angel Lara
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Swisher v. Lumpkin
as 23-50206
Petitioner / Appellant:
Bryan Lacy Swisher
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Deem v. Garrido
as 23-30169
Petitioner / Appellant:
Steven Lynn Deem, also known as Steve Deem
Respondent / Appellee:
F. J. Garrido, Bureau of Prisons
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 23-10287
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, R. Bowers, Sr Warden, NFN Wonders and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
