Fifth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,651
Simmons Bank v. Monocoque Diversified Interests, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Simmons Bank
Defendant:
Monocoque Diversified Interests, LLC, Mary Alice Keyes, and Sean Leon Nadeau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Xi et al v. BES Kessler Park Fund X11 LLC
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
K'in Way Xi, George Gilmore, Glen Marion and others
Defendant:
BES Kessler Park Fund X11 LLC doing business as Axis Kessler Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Harrison v. Iriarte et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Marco V. Harrison, Jr.
Defendant:
Jesus Iriarte and Twenty4seven Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Harrison v. Owens, et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Marco Harrison
Defendant:
Thomas Owens and Trustmark National Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Legacy Housing Corporation v. Rodwell et al
as 4:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Legacy Housing Corporation
Defendant:
Bill Rodwell, Cynthia Rodwell, Tony Hartsgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Shafirovich v. Saleh
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Alexander Shafirovich
Defendant:
Mohamad Saleh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SIMPLOT AB RETAIL, INC. v. LAZY S B AG SERVICES, LLC
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
SIMPLOT AB RETAIL, INC. doing business as SIMPLOT GROWER SOLUTIONS
Defendant:
LAZY S B AG SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Investar Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
as 4:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Investar Bank
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank and Modlyne Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Watson v. Trachte Building Systems, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Cody Watson and Samantha Watson
Defendant:
Trachte Building Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrumen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
