Fifth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 17,337
Jones v. Commissioner of SSA
as 4:2024cv01508
Plaintiff:
Bertha Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tartt v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01521
Plaintiff:
Jenell M. Tartt
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whittington v. Commissioner of SSA
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Lisa Whittington
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Falgout v. Social Security
as 6:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Evangelia Falgout
Defendant:
U S Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Idom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jared Idom
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dyson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dwaine Dyson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Donna Dee Moore
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Nathasha Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Semper v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Tonya Semper
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hebert v. COMMISIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 6:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Huey Hebert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
