Fifth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 1,071
McWilliams v. Enlink Midstream Operating LP et al
as 3:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Lance Wade McWilliams
Defendant:
Enlink Midstream Operating, LP, James Wayne Blalack, Stacy Ann Szabla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McTorry v. Nexus Health Systems, Inc.
as 4:2022cv04479
Plaintiff:
Chase McTorry
Defendant:
Nexus Health Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Garrett v. Happy State Bank
as 2:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Leah Garrett
Defendant:
Happy State Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Scott Loftin v. Credit Human Federal Credit Union, et al
as 5:2022cv01343
Plaintiff:
Scott Loftin
Defendant:
Credit Human Federal Credit Union and Brent Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dominguez v. Cattlemens Bank
as 3:2022cv02777
Plaintiff:
Dylan Dominguez
Defendant:
Cattlemens Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
West v. ISD Renal, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Kristian West
Defendant:
ISD Renal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Towner v. Mississippi Regional Housing Authority V
as 3:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Dartiya Towner
Defendant:
Mississippi Regional Housing Authority V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hairston v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2022cv02645
Plaintiff:
Doctor Hairston
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Delaney v. A.J. Hurt, Jr., Inc.
as 4:2022cv04060
Plaintiff:
Ashlea Delaney
Defendant:
A.J. Hurt, Jr., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Mintz v. First Continental Mortgage, Ltd.
as 4:2022cv04062
Plaintiff:
Libby Mintz
Defendant:
First Continental Mortgage, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
