US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
Cases 181 - 190 of 45,249
Okorie v. Poncho
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Ikechukwu Hyginius Okorie
Defendant:
James Poncho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Carroll v. Mississippi Dept. of Corr. Records Dept.
as 3:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Wiley Zachary Carroll
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. of Corr. Records Dept.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mobery v. Sissytrunk
as 3:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Mobery
Defendant:
Brady Sissytrunk
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Cain et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Immanuel Manning
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Unit 29 (MSP) Staff (Time Periods), SMCI Staff (Time Periods) and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pike County Jail
as 5:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Landon Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Pike County Jail
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of La'Mello Parker et al v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2023cv00185
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McKinney v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Bryan D. McKinney
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and John and Jane Does A, B and C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dressner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Ronald Christopher Dressner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
