US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 137
Brooks v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2009cv00908
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Brooks
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Boyd v. Union Pacific Corporation
as 2:2009cv00254
Plaintiff:
Brenda Boyd
Defendant:
Union Pacific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2009cv00138
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company and Michael Scot Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Rutledge v. Kansas City Southern Railroad
as 2:2009cv00122
Plaintiff:
John Rutledge
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Cauthron v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 5:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Bradley Cauthron
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hedrick v. Bowen
as 4:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
Diane Hedrick
Movant:
United States
Defendant:
Joyce Bowen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clouatre v. C&S Service and Supply Inc
as 2:2008cv00431
Plaintiff:
Brock L. Clouatre
Defendant:
C&S Service and Supply Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Stoudt v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 9:2008cv00188
Plaintiff:
Theodore H Stoudt, Theodore H Stoudt, Theodore H Stoudt and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roberts vs Union Pacific
as 9:2008cv00178
Plaintiff:
Mark Roberts, Mark Roberts, Mark Roberts and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hawthorne v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 9:2008cv00153
Plaintiff:
Jesse Hawthorne and Jesse Hawthorne
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
