US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 9,365
Hill v. Warden, USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Gregory Marshall Hill
Respondent:
Warden, USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McCoy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
James McCoy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Acy v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00136
Petitioner:
James Antwone Acy
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v. Rowe
as 2:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Larry Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivadeneira v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Felipe Rivadeneira
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nunez v. Warden
as 6:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Victor Gabriel Nunez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomason Smith
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jiles v. Medical Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Dmarcus Jiles
Defendant:
Medical Nurse, Warden, Captain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Traylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Tony Traylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Traylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Tony Traylor, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
