US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 9,340
Garcia v. Disciplinary Department
as 6:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Disciplinary Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jerry Ray Brown
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duvall v. Gregg County Sheriff
as 6:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Steven Lee Duvall
Respondent:
Gregg County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solomon v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
Surafel H. Solomon
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ramirez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ezenwa v. Warden, SPC Beaumont Camp
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Maxwell Chibueze Ezenwa
Respondent:
Warden, SPC Beaumont Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Buckley v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Leon Buckley
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grammar v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 9:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Donny Grammar
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Apodaca v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00108
Petitioner:
Victor Andrew Apodaca
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Monroe v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Gregory Zachary Monroe
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
