US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Cases 51 - 60 of 69,156
WSOU Investments, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
WSOU Investments, LLC doing business as Brazos Licensing and Development
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Wolfford v. Hyland, III
as 9:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
James Hyland, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolfford v. Ernestine
as 9:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
Julye Ernestine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MusicQubed Innovations, LLC v. upGrad Education Private Limited et al
as 2:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
MusicQubed Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
upGrad Education Private Limited and KnowledgeHut, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Guilbeaux v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Jessie Guilbeaux
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
COLONIAL TERMINAL LOGISTICS, LLC v. M/T LARGO EVOLUTION, in rem
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
COLONIAL TERMINAL LOGISTICS, LLC
Defendant:
M/T LARGO EVOLUTION, in rem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
v. Natour et al
as 4:2024cv00389
Defendant:
Nick Natour and Enclare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Andrepont v. Tabares et al
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Krystal Andrepont
Defendant:
Yuri Pen Tabares and Yuri Auto Transport Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Ervin v. The Kroger Co.
as 6:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ervin
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
