US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 111 - 120 of 10,979
Littles v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00147
Petitioner: Justin A. Littles
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00041
Petitioner: Kirk Wayne McBride, Sr
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guzman v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00042
Petitioner: Bartholomew Antonio Guzman
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00045
Petitioner: James Ryan Ross
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv00095
Petitioner: Gregory Scott
Respondent: Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
De Los Reyes v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00052
Petitioner: Francisco De Los Reyes
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morales v. Head
as 4:2024cv00024
Petitioner: Ernesto Morales
Respondent: Butch Head
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04795
Petitioner: Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent: TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moses v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04778
Petitioner: Robert Arthur Moses
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04775
Petitioner: Michael Gene Walker
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?