US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 181 - 190 of 10,999
Burke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04056
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04055
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04046
Petitioner:
Joshua Calhoun
Defendant:
TDCJ Director
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tatum v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04025
Petitioner:
Steven Tatum
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Redic v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04028
Petitioner:
Timothy Anthony Redic
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03998
Petitioner:
Tony Henry Casey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03977
Petitioner:
Delarick William Evans
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Osborne
as 3:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Williams
Respondent:
Sheriff Frank D. Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
De La Cruz v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03965
Petitioner:
Andrea De La Cruz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin and Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delagarza v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Benino Delagarza
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
