US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 10,976
Conley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
David Ray Conley, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCray v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00917
Petitioner:
Donald McCray
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00817
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Rpgers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00804
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Fagan
as 4:2024cv00741
Petitioner:
Darren Tremell Hughes
Respondent:
Sheriff Eric Fagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vasquez-Cortes v. Mayorkas
as 4:2024cv00742
Petitioner:
Juan Vasquez-Cortes
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Polk v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00726
Petitioner:
Mavis Ray Polk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lillie v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
Wilbert Trayvon Lee Lillie
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Darrell Anthony Williams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
