US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 272
Lopez v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv04338
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Carmen Lopez
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Campos v. John L. Wortham & Son, L.P.
as 4:2019cv04222
Defendant:
John L. Wortham & Son, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Melissa Campos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Harvey v. Gates Corporation
as 4:2019cv04217
Defendant:
Gates Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mr robert R harvey and Robert R. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Pipkin v. Universal Protection Service, LP et al
as 4:2019cv02906
Defendant:
Universal Protection Service, LP and Universal Protection Service GP, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carina Pipkin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Desai v. Invesco Group Services, Inc.
as 4:2019cv02842
Defendant:
Invesco Group Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Billy Desai
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Lalla v. G & H Towing
as 3:2019cv00244
Defendant:
G & H Towing Company
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lalla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Shupack v. EP Energy Global, LLC f/k/a EP Energy LLC
as 4:2019cv02519
Defendant:
EP Energy Global, LLC f/k/a EP Energy LLC and EP Energy Global, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eric Shupack and Eric C. Shupack
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Johnson v. Belo Advertising Customer Services, Inc.,
as 4:2019cv02531
Defendant:
Belo Advertising Customer Services, Inc.,
Plaintiff:
Elaine Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cobbin-Wooten v. Invesco Ltd. et al
as 4:2019cv02389
Defendant:
Invesco Inc., Invesco Advisors, Inc. and Invesco Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Raslyn Cobbin-Wooten
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Barreras v. Horizon Montessori Public Schools et al
as 7:2019cv00211
Defendant:
South Texas Educational Technologies, Inc. and Horizon Montessori Public Schools
Plaintiff:
Brandy Barreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
