Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 41,837
Coleman, Jr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Edward James Coleman, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. No Named Respondent
as 3:2024cv00868
Petitioner:
Joe L Garrison
Respondent:
No named respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucas v. Texas
as 5:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Alan Lucas
Defendant:
Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maldonado v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Symon Anthony Maldonado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McDonald v. State of Texas
as 2:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Randy Joel McDonald
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sanchez, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Samuel Sanchez, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elizondo v. Lumpkin
as 7:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Jaime Elizondo
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
