District Court Cases in Texas
Cases 51 - 60 of 438,626
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pimpton v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Frederick Devell Pimpton
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Warden King
as 4:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Juan Daniel Garcia
Respondent:
Warden King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FREEMAN et al v. Shiya Investments, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE FREEMAN and ISMAEL CALDERON NIEVES
Defendant:
Shiya Investments, LLC, BJ Patel, Vinay Patel and others
Gardner v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Holly Gardner
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
VDPP, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 3:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
VDPP, LLC
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tire Zone, Inc. v. Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
as 3:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Tire Zone, Inc.
Defendant:
Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
National Association of Private Fund Managers et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
National Association of Private Fund Managers, Alternative Investment Management Association Limited and Managed Funds Association
Defendant:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.