Sixth Circuit Real Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,490
Underhill v. Metro Government et al
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Lisa Underhill
Defendant:
Metro Government and Mike O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1437 U.S. Housing Act of 1937
Green v. DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Green
Defendant:
DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Fay Servicing, LLC and others
Julie Tamm, et al v. Milan Nerad
as 24-1155
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. TAMM and ROSEANNA M. PRZYBYLSKI
Defendant:
MILAN NERAD, in his official and personal capacities
Hagan v. Barnett et al
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Robert Hagan
Defendant:
Denise Barnett, Tim Bartley, Marie Elaine Bartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Owen Barnaby v. MI, et al
as 24-1141
Plaintiff:
OWEN W. BARNABY
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Former Governor and others
Detroit Renaissance Fund LLC v. Crigler et al
as 2:2024cv10377
Plaintiff:
Detroit Renaissance Fund LLC
Defendant:
Edris Crigler and Damond C. Williams
Stinson v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 2:2024cv02094
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper
Luxco, Inc. v. Nelson County et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Luxco, Inc.
Defendant:
Nelson County, Nelson County Fiscal Court, Judge Executive Tim Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MGPI of Indiana, LLC v. City of Williamstown, KY et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
MGPI of Indiana, LLC
Defendant:
City of Williamstown, KY, Williamstown City Council, Kim Crupper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Owen Barnaby v. MI, et al
as 24-1086
Plaintiff:
OWEN W. BARNABY
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, GRETCHEN WHITMER, Governor, JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Former Governor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
