Sixth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,589
Louden v. Faurecia Interior Systems USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv11235
Plaintiff:
Miriam Louden
Defendant:
Faurecia Interior Systems USA, Inc., FAURECIA INTERIOR SYSTEMS, INC.,, FAURECIA USA HOLDINGS, INC., and and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hooker v. Capri Gardens
as 2:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Ray Hooker
Defendant:
Capri Gardens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ANDUJAR et al v. HUB GROUP TRUCKING, INC.
as 2:2024cv02296
Plaintiff:
JORGE ANDUJAR and FRANKLIN PENA BATISTA
Defendant:
Hub Group Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
John Kelmendi v. Michigan Office of Retirement Services, et al
as 24-1344
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. KELMENDI, Doctor
Defendant:
MICHIGAN OFFICE OF RETIREMENT SERVICES, DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION, DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS and others
v. Local 337
as 2:2024cv11034
Defendant:
Teamsters Local 337
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Local 337 v. Great Lakes Coca-Cola Distribution, LLC
as 2:2024cv11035
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 337
Defendant:
Great Lakes Coca-Cola Distribution, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Gray v. Pace Academy et al
as 2:2024cv10971
Plaintiff:
GRITIANA GRAY
Defendant:
PACE ACADEMY, JOSEPH POLLACK, ACADEMIC CENTER OF EXCELLENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carlyle v. Stryker Employment Company, LLC
as 2:2024cv02226
Plaintiff:
John Carlyle
Defendant:
Stryker Employment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Kirstyn Bashaw v. Majestic Care of Whitehall, LLC
as 24-3292
Plaintiff:
KIRSTYN PAIGE BASHAW
Defendant:
MAJESTIC CARE OF WHITEHALL, LLC
Banks v. Geodis Logistics, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Michael Banks
Defendant:
Geodis Logistics, LLC, Anthony Sweeney, Ryan Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
