Sixth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 31,961
Dorn v. Progressive Quality Care, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dorn
Defendant:
Progressive Quality Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Caraballo v. Cleveland Clinic Welfare Benefits Plan et al.
as 1:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Carmen Caraballo
Defendant:
Cleveland Clinic Welfare Benefits Plan and Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Wimsatt v. Petro Towery, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Erik Wimsatt
Defendant:
Petro Towery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Patsey v. Durand Area Schools et al
as 2:2024cv11172
Plaintiff:
Crystal Patsey
Defendant:
Durand Area Schools and Hi-Tec Building Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Villumsen v. Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02076
Plaintiff:
Jens Verner Villumsen
Defendant:
Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kordie v. HCF Management, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Nicole Kordie
Defendant:
HCF Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Boeman v. Henry Ford Hospital
as 2:2024cv11169
Plaintiff:
Emily Boeman
Defendant:
Henry Ford Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Emery v. Suburban Mobility Authority For Regional Transportation (SMART)
as 2:2024cv11163
Plaintiff:
Jasmine S Emery
Defendant:
Suburban Mobility Authority For Regional Transportation (SMART)
Amir Jones v. Romeo Management Group, LLC dba PUFF Cannabis Company
as 2:2024cv11159
Plaintiff:
Amir Jones
Defendant:
Romeo Management Group, LLC Doing business as PUFF Cannabis Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murphy v. The Auto Club Group et al
as 2:2024cv11168
Plaintiff:
Regis Murphy
Defendant:
The Auto Club Group and Unify HR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
