US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 796
Kopp Development Inc. v. Metrasens, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01216
Defendant:
Metrasens, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kopp Development Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Noco Company v. Shenzhen Xinshengfeng Trading Co., Ltd.
as 1:2021cv01191
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Shenzhen Xinshengfeng Trading Co., Ltd. doing business as Autoxel
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Brightplanet Corporation II, Inc. v. IBM Corporation
as 1:2021cv00937
Defendant:
IBM Corporation
Plaintiff:
Brightplanet Corporation II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Pearl IP Licensing LLC v. Eaton Corporation
as 1:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Pearl IP Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Optical Licensing LLC v. Rutronik Inc.
as 1:2021cv00880
Defendant:
Rutronik Inc.
Plaintiff:
Optical Licensing LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Tunnel IP LLC v. Audio-Technica U.S., Inc.
as 5:2021cv00854
Plaintiff:
Tunnel IP LLC
Defendant:
Audio-Technica U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Gridley IP LLC v. Doordash, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00699
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gridley IP LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Mellaconic IP LLC v. Kourt Security Partners LLC
as 1:2021cv00697
Defendant:
Kourt Security Partners LLC doing business as Select Security
Plaintiff:
Mellaconic IP LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Mellaconic IP LLC v. Vector Security, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00698
Plaintiff:
Mellaconic IP LLC
Defendant:
Vector Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
D&L Properties South, Inc. v. Berk Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00619
Plaintiff:
D&L Properties South, Inc.
Defendant:
M.H. Enterprises International, Inc. other d/b/a Teriyaki Madness, Berk Enterprises, Inc. and M.H. Enterprises International, Inc. doing business as Teriyaki Madness
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
