US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 17,490
Ocana et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
Ofelia Ocana and Homero Ochoa
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lesmeister v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Debbra Lesmeister
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathews v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Christina Mathews
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brunette-Iddings v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Estella Brunette-Iddings
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
John Young
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meyers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Douglas Meyers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McGown v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
John McGown
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oke v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Randall Oke
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mannisto v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mannisto
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Denson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02022
Plaintiff:
Porchie Denson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
