US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 30,780
Jespersen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02064
Plaintiff:
Kellie Jespersen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guerra et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02066
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Guerra and Danielle Guerra
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ables et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02069
Plaintiff:
Charles Ables and Cynthia G Ables
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02071
Plaintiff:
Sara Sams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cummings v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02063
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cummings
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kaplan v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Kaplan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grow v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02073
Plaintiff:
Shannon Grow
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Padilla v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Cathy Padilla
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Debra Nelson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02061
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
