US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,294
Bridges v. USA
as 1:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Luterres Montez Bridges
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. USA
as 2:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Harold Vernon Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Wayne Adkins
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Brian Eller, Unknown Correction Officer One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Silverdale Detention Center
as 1:2024mc00013
Plaintiff:
Lajuan Marquest Woods
Defendant:
Silverdale Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Silverdale Detention Center
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Lajuan Marquest Woods
Defendant:
Silverdale Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suggs v. Dewberry et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jesse Suggs
Defendant:
Wendy Dewberry, Kayla Smith and Quality Correctional Health Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joy v. USA
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
James J. Joy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. McFarlin et al
as 3:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ryan Smith
Defendant:
Patrick McFarlin, Sheriff Hodges and Q.C.H.C. Medical Company/Entity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Eller
as 4:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Jamie Cunningham and James Cunningham
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
