Middle District of Tennessee Cases

Cases filed


Cases 71 - 80 of 26,496
Vichitvongsa v. USA
as 3:2017cv01329
Petitioner: Manila Vichitvongsa
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stinson v. Farris et al
as 2:2017cv00057
Plaintiff: Bradley Stinson
Defendant: Brandon Farris, f/n/u Hilsky, John Doe
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Wright v. 3rd Devil Online, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01333
Plaintiff: Darrel Wayne Wright
Defendant: 3rd Devil Online, LLC, Kirk Nielsen, Woodstock International, Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
Adkisson v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv01332
Plaintiff: Deontae Adkisson
Defendant: Tony Parker, Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Correct Care et al
as 3:2017cv01322
Plaintiff: Cornelius Pierce
Defendant: Correct Care, (f/n/u) Bridges, Core Civic and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01324
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois v. Envision Healthcare Corporation, et al.,
as 3:2017cv01323
Plaintiff: Carpenters Pension Fund of Illinois
Defendant: Envision Healthcare Corporation, Christopher A. Holden, William A. Sanger and others
Movant: PLYMOUTH COUNTY CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Rinkenberger et al v. Irwin
as 3:2017cv01325
Plaintiff: Raymond Rinkenberger , Cleda Rinkenberger
Defendant: Natalie Irwin
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Watkins v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2017cv01321
Petitioner: Cedric Watkins
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Todd v. Lindamood
as 3:2017cv01320
Petitioner: Xavier S. Todd
Respondent: Cherry Lindamood
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?