US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Cases 41 - 50 of 35,428
Doe #063 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
John Doe #063
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #064 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Doe #064
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #065 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
John Doe #065
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fry et al v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
David Fry and ZCO Carriers Corp.
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ferguson v. Walgreens Co. et al
as 3:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Travonsha L. Ferguson
Defendant:
Walgreens Co. doing business as Walgreens and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Renewed Hope Clinical Services, LLC et al v. Change Healthcare Inc.
as 3:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Renewed Hope Clinical Services, LLC and Raincross Family Counseling, Inc.
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Talley v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Talley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Howard v. TBI et al
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
William Howard
Defendant:
TBI, FSP Nashville, Chelsea M. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reeners v. McCormick et al
as 3:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jayson Reeners
Defendant:
Nekeisha Bryant McCormick, Gregory Traylor, Alegra Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Jones
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
