US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 7,266
Ramirez-Ortega v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02185
Petitioner:
Hernan Ramirez-Ortega
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Settle v. Vantell
as 1:2024cv01060
Petitioner:
Mike Settle
Defendant:
Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Payne v. Whisman et al
as 1:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Cesare Payne
Defendant:
Candace Whisman, Camala Morris, Wendy Pruett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Driskell v. Baker et al
as 2:2024cv02183
Plaintiff:
Tommy L. Driskell
Defendant:
Arkeycia Baker, Endrea Howard and Kathy Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clum v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02172
Petitioner:
David Clum, Jr.
Respondent:
C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clinton v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02171
Petitioner:
Gregory Keith Clinton
Respondent:
Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fields v. Strada et al
as 1:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Benny C. Fields
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Brandon Watwood, Lt. Suanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Campbell v. Beal et al
as 1:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
Robert Duane Campbell
Defendant:
Steve Beal and Junior Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trujillo v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02161
Petitioner:
Paul Trujillo
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wooden v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
John H. Wooden and Jabari I. Mandela
Defendant:
William Lee, David Raush, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
