Seventh Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 189
ROBBINS v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv04500
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
KRISTI A. ROBBINS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WILSON v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00456
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
BOBBY J WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Newborn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv01435
Plaintiff:
Ayra S Newborn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hill, Jr. v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv06153
Plaintiff:
Claude L. Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joyce Bookshester v. Thomas Price
as 17-2478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE BOOKSHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PRICE, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
James v. Social Security Adm.
as 1:2017cv05252
Plaintiff:
Alonzo James
Defendant:
Social Security Adm.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tshomba v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv02162
Plaintiff:
Clement Tshomba
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
UGO v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv00327
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
ISABEL A. UGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Joyce Bookshester v. Thomas Price
as 17-2294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOYCE BOOKSHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PRICE
HOUSE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv02109
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE L. HOUSE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
